Comparing the way that
the genders think
Being the father of two grown boys and two grown girls, I
find myself acutely aware of the expectations and preconceptions that society
imposes on people, based purely upon their gender. To counteract the effect of those
stereotypes, I often say that I’ve taught my boys to be “sensitive” and my
girls to be “tough”. That’s a huge oversimplification, but you get the
idea.
Suppose that we want to go beyond that, though. Then where do
we start? Perhaps we need to understand which of our gender-based behavior
patterns are taught and which are instinctive. Of course, this brings us back
to the age-old issue of “nurture vs nature”.
As someone who meditates, I’ve learned that there is a big
gap between the actual reality and what
we think is real, what we’ve been told is real or what we assume is real. This
is what meditators may refer to as “clarity” and, while it can typically be
painful to accept, it also provides a solid foundation upon which to build our
emotional well-being.
Similarly, I believe that the other cornerstones of
meditation are “detachment” and “mindfulness”. While the former allows us to
experience life without getting too “caught up in the drama”, the latter
reminds us to always appreciate what we have. Another popular interpretation of mindfulness
is to live in the present moment, rather than to dwell upon the past or the
future.
In fact, to me the key to meditation is to not dwell on
anything at all and thus to be free of what’s commonly referred to as the
“monkey mind”. But that’ll be the topic for another conversation. For now, the
reason that these ideas are relevant involves how we perceive ourselves and the
world around us.
From the day that we’re born we’re bombarded with images,
sounds and sensations that are intended to be specific to our gender.
Throughout their lives, boys and girls are dressed differently, handled
differently and spoken to differently.
Thus most societies generally expect girls to be made
“pretty”, via the way that we dress or adorn them, how we arrange their hair
and so on. They’re generally expected to “nice”, an ambiguous term which tends
to mean that they should demur, not be aggressive or violent, stay clean, not
make trouble, etc.
On the other hand, the expression “boys will be boys” suggests
that they can get away with a lot that the girls would be punished for. Boys
can generally fight, swear, get dirty, be loud and play tricks on people,
without risk of serious repercussions.
Conversely, pain and suffering are acceptable conditions for
boys, but not for girls. “It’s good for him”, people will say. “It’ll teach him
to be a man”. Until the age of five or so a boy can at least cry, but after
that he must be stoic and bear the discomfort without flinching.
Meanwhile, we’re supposed to shield the girls from anything
unpleasant. They’re encouraged to be squeamish and avoid anything messy, dirty,
sticky, bloody or painful. It gets worse
as the girls grow up, when we shield them even more, lest they become “hysterical”.
Really? So they’re
telling us that to rave and rant like a lunatic is to behave in a way that’s
associated with the female reproductive organs. After all, that’s where terms
like “hysterectomy” originate. Um no, I
don’t think so. Ask any kid who’s been calmed down in a crisis by their ever-loving
mom.
Likewise, if we’re in a testosterone-laden environment then
everybody must be at each other’s throats, right? Well, that’s equally absurd.
After all, being male doesn’t mean one will be violent any more than being
female is a sure sign of hysteria.
Sure, I get it … on average, males are more likely to get
physical and females are more likely to be emotional. Duh. But that doesn’t mean that all of us behave
that way, any more than we’re all the same height or weight.
We can all strive to be better, or at least different from
what we’re expected to be. For example, I marvel at how women talk so freely
about how they feel. Guys role their eyes and pretend to be asleep when asked
to describe their emotions, but women thrive on it.
Yet isn’t it obvious that men would be more emotionally
healthy if they just talked about their feelings more, instead of repressing
them?
Another example is how women are conditioned to constantly
be aware of how they look. Men are
amazed at the amount of time, effort and money that women put into their
appearance. “Yes”, the women will say, “but then the guys go nuts over the
prettiest woman they see. That justifies the effort!”
Well, yes, there’s clearly some truth in the observation
that men will gravitate to the most attractive women around … but does that
really mean she has to be pretty in the classic sense? I’ve observed many women who don’t necessarily have pretty
features, but who are nonetheless beautiful, because of the way they carry
themselves or behave.
Put another way, femininity does not necessarily emanate
from clothing, makeup or jewelry. Rather, it comes from the person wearing
them. Someone who is attracted to females may be sub-consciously stimulated by
their pheromones, the shape of their bodies, their facial features, the way
that they move and so on.
Likewise, masculinity is not just a function of the clothes
that a man wears … it comes from characteristics such as the way he carries
himself, his self-confidence and how he behaves. Other factors – such as humor,
intelligence, kindness, integrity, loyalty and reliability - can be attractive
in any gender.
Obviously the bodies under the clothing are also essential
to the way that people perceive a given gender. In general, men are expected to
be muscular and women curvy, but of course people come in all shapes and sizes.
In fairness, it should be said that these days everyone is expected to be fit,
regardless of their gender.
So, to summarize, this discussion has raised a lot more questions
than it’s answered. In brief, the basic dilemma can be stated like this, “How do
we break the stereotype, without losing those qualities that (we believe) define
how attractive we are?”
Well, that’s certainly a good question!
However, the answer is complex, due to the nature of the problem.
Let’s assume that at least some men yearn to cast off their macho image and some
women wish that they could stop dressing up like dolls.
How can they do that and still get the attention of the people
they want to attract? To answer that question properly, we need to explore the
very nature of what makes us who we are.
By the way, this discussion applies to everyone, regardless
of how they define themselves. We live
in a word where genders change and there are many states that exist between being
male or female. My roots are French and I have to return to an expression that doesn’t
translate quite right into English.
Ultimately, what we all seek is to be comfortable in our own
skins. Next time, let’s talk more about what that entails … and how we can all
support each other in that noble quest.
No comments:
Post a Comment